The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian: User Reviews
As much as I like sarcasm, I think the metromix's movie critic's review is excessively harsh and sarcastic. I'm glad I saw this movie. I think the special effects (centaurs, Aslan, etc.) were much improved over the first Chronicles movie. I'd agree that I prefer the Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, in print and in the movie. I'd agree that making these books into movies is a challenge because Lewis drew from an atypical array of fantastical sources. I'd also agree the book is better... they usually are... but maybe especially with Lewis's books, which challenge our imaginations and the depth of our thinking. But I think in this movie the children were charming (they aren't supposed to be more than ordinary non-superhero children who've experience Narnia before and, despite clumsiness, saved it once before), the Prince convincing, and the plot sufficiently rich for children, teens and adults to ponder greed, temptation, courage, selflessness, faith in higher (divine) power when seeminlgy overwhelmed by evil, ingenuity, providence working in different ways at different times, perseverance, faith and hope. I recommend seeing it, even if just for an uncommon dose of these elements. Perhaps if there were more movies like this, I'd give less than five stars because I'd have better grounds for comparison, but there are not, especially not for children. I don't have children yet, but if I had them, this is one of the few movies in the theaters that I'd want them to see.
Report This CommentI've read the chronicles of narnia books. Truth be told the movies fallow the books better than most of your average books/movies especially against movies like Harry Potter. Where chuncks of the books are missing from the movie(like big chunks). Truth be told is the characters are played very well by the young actors cause thats how the characters in the book are written. if you read and payed attention to the books you would know and understand that C.S Lewis wrote his characters to be almost just like those that are portrade in the film.
The books are based on the bible. No saint, prophet, or " good guy" where big bad a$$ dudes they fought better with peace and faith in there hearts hents why peter in the start of the book/movie lost his fights and his brother ended up saveing his butt. Edmunds character gained faith in the first movie when asland gave himself to save Edmund gained a sense of humility plus a huge dose of faith when seeing both sides of good and bad.
The characters where also acted out by the way they were written. You also have to remember he wrote these books for his son that was fighting in WWII. He wanted to send story's of hope, faith, happiness, love, joy, and over coming those things that are greater than you through faith.
So the movie truly was not bad. It was very good. It was truly based on the book.
Report This CommentAds by Google
Review Summary
The following scores represent the average rating submitted by 16 users:
- Overall user rating:



